Guest Post: National Patricide by David C. Stolinsky

My father was a respected physician and family man. He died when I was 19. All my life I have tried, with varying success, to follow his example. But what if I couldn’t remember him? I would have no role model to emulate. I wouldn’t know where I came from. Even worse, what if someone told me my father was a convicted felon who abandoned my mother and me? My whole life would have been affected for the worse. Isn’t this exactly what our so-called educational system has done, and continues to do, to our young people?

Ask young people about George Washington. They may know something about the Revolution and the founding of our nation, but they are almost sure to say, “Washington owned slaves.” They are unlikely to add that he freed them at his death. The negative aspects of the man obscure the positive aspects − that’s what young people have been taught.

Ask about Abraham Lincoln. A young person is likely to say he was a racist. Yes, Lincoln did express what would be considered racist views by today’s standards. But he held the Union together in a Civil War that was fought over slavery, and as a result slavery was ended. Lincoln was shot for his efforts − doesn’t he deserve some credit? But not to our “educators,” who teach that the Civil War was “all about economics.” Do you know 360,000 people willing to die for “economics”? Do you know even one? This notion is not just unhistorical; it is irrational.

By the way, how many European leaders were named Abraham? And how many European nations have towns named Bethlehem, Nazareth, or Bethesda, or parks named Zion? I can’t think of one. Unlike other nations, America is based on Judeo-Christian values. But we’re in the process of forgetting them, too.

The use of Old Testament names is not just a fad. Americans used to know, quite clearly, that they were naming their children after biblical figures. If you doubt this, listen to the words of a popular Civil War song in the North, written in response to Lincoln’s call for volunteers:

We are coming, Father Abraham,
Three hundred thousand more.

Note that Lincoln was not referred to as “President Lincoln,” or even as “Honest Abe.” No, he was called “Father Abraham,” a clear reference to the biblical father of the Jewish people, and the first standard-bearer of the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Ask a young person about Grant. If you are lucky, he will say that Grant is the man on the fifty-dollar bill. But the general who led the Union to victory and thereby ended slavery? Are you serious? Or ask about Jefferson. If you are lucky, the young person will mumble something about “the wall of separation between church and state.” But the author of the Declaration of Independence, our founding document, which declares that our rights come from God, not from the government? Are you joking?

If I forgot my wedding anniversary, my wife would remind me − and in a not very pleasant manner. But what if she forgot as well? Superficially, there would be no problem. We would spend a day like any other. But on a deeper level, there would be a serious problem. The fact that we both forgot our anniversary would indicate that our relationship had already suffered serious deterioration. Our amnesia would be symptomatic of a more basic problem.

What is true in personal life is also true in national life. Our national amnesia is related to deterioration of our society. The amnesia is not spontaneous. It is induced by our educational system. From primary school to middle school to high school to university to graduate school, students are subjected to a curriculum filled with socialism and pacifism, but bereft of anything remotely resembling Americanism. Ask anyone under the age of 40 when is Washington’s or Lincoln’s Birthday. They will be unable to tell you, or even to guess why you asked.

If I develop amnesia, other people may be able to remind me of what I have forgotten. But what if everyone around me also has amnesia? Not only will they be unable to remind me of what I forgot, but they will not even be aware I have forgotten anything. Mass amnesia is serious precisely because it is unrecognized, and an unrecognized condition is never remedied. No one knows there is anything to remedy.

When Michelle Obama said that this is the first time in her adult life she is really proud of her country, she did not misspeak. She revealed how she, and many people like her, really feel.

Elections every four years, with peaceful change of administrations?
People of all ethnic, racial, and religious groups serving in our armed forces and risking their lives for their country?

The firefighters and police on 9/11?

The passengers on Flight 93?

The 14 Medals of Honor awarded for service in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Over 60% of the recent Nobel Prizes in Medicine, when we represent only 4% of the world’s population?

The soil of Europe and Asia soaked with the blood of hundreds of thousands of American troops who died to remove the shackles of tyranny from other nations?

All that is nothing to be proud of?

The author of one of the most widely used textbooks of American history, the late Howard Zinn, claimed that America has done more bad than good in the world. I heard him say it. Europe under the Nazis? Asia under the Japanese fascists? To him, that would be preferable to a strong America.

Just as I would have been damaged if I were taught that my father was a good-for-nothing or a criminal, so our young people have been damaged by teaching them that their founding fathers were worthless at best, and actually destructive at worst. But the damage is not irreparable. Our curricula must be freed from anti-American bias.

We do not want chauvinism, but to avoid it we need not teach anti-Americanism. We do not want super-patriots, but we need not try to produce no patriots at all. Our enemies have fanatical beliefs, but to avoid fanaticism we need not try to destroy our own beliefs. We are engaged in a culture war with extremist Islam.

The first rule of gun fights is bring a gun. The first rule of culture wars is bring a culture. Those who are trying to tear down our culture are, in fact, trying to disarm us.

These people assume that if they dismantle American culture, and Western culture in general, the vacuum will be filled by a beautiful, nebulous, homogenized mixture of all the cultures of the world. But this mixture does not exist.

What will fill the cultural vacuum is the primitive, seventh-century culture of extremist Islam. This is already happening in Europe, where polygamy is now accepted. What’s next? Kicking blind people with guide dogs out of cabs and shops? Wife beating? “Honor” killing of daughters and sisters? Genital mutilation of girls? Is that multicultural enough for you?

Presidents Day is merely an excuse for a three-day weekend. We need real national holidays that remind us of those who sacrificed so much to bequeath us the freedom we enjoy, but no longer appreciate. We need to reestablish the traditions that remind us of who we are and where we come from. We need textbooks that are not anti-American and even anti-freedom. We need William Bennett’s “America: The Last Best Hope” and Schweikart and Allen’s “A Patriot’s History of the United States.”
Patricide is killing one’s father. It is a terrible crime. National patricide is defaming our national fathers. It is a terrible mistake.

The author thanks Rabbi Daniel Lapin for pointing out in “America’s Real War” that defaming one’s father can damage one’s whole life. Contact: You are welcome to publish or post these articles, provided that you cite the author and website.


IncomeAbundanceSet, March 2014

7 thoughts on “Guest Post: National Patricide by David C. Stolinsky”

  1. Judy, I truly appreciate each and every time one of my readers takes the time to comment. I am guilty myself of lurking on blogs I tremendously enjoy and/or learn from (actually maybe those two are inseparable) and not letting the writer know that I am there. So, I do thank you.

  2. Thanks for sharing the article, Susan. I enjoy your weekly musings, along with your husband’s timely advice. You’re both blessings in my life. Thank you.

  3. Yes, I agree.
    As we know, unfortunately, a child’s well-being tends to be hindered in fatherless households. I am reminded of a study regarding fathers in which even if a father was not physically in a home due to death, the children still flourished if stories of that father were repeated along with remembrances such as pictures of the father were displayed.
    I think this relates on a national level as well. The wonderful historical roots of our country may seem like they are ‘dying,’ yet we as families can fight to keep the Founding Fathers ‘alive’ within our own homes, inspiring the next generation.

  4. Lyn, It’s wonderful that you are able to have a good attitude, and you are right that we can overcome disadvantages. While the opening of Dr. Stolinsy’s article may strike you personally, don’t you think he does have a point on the national level?

  5. My father is a convicted felon, and while there is much pain involved, I may choose to become bitter or better because of it. In fact, I don’t believe Providence would have allowed such a circumstance had I not been able to grow from it somehow. As a Christian I have a great hope. Environment need not define nor defile me, despite B.F. Skinner’s theory which has made its rounds in most if not all of the teacher’s colleges. The lecture found in Hillsdale College’s May/June ‘Imprimis’ relates as well. Furthermore, we read in Proverbs,’For as he thinks in his heart, so is he.’
    Just as my whole life does not have to be ‘affected for the worse’ because of my father’s crime, hope is not lost for America. As I homeschool my children, I remind them of God’s mighty works throughout all of history. A remnant who loves her country remains.

  6. History tells that there have been civilizations that raze previous traditions to the ground in order to start over with a new religion or a new social order. These civilizations fare poorly, for in fact they have thrown out the baby with the bath water, denying the goodness that resides in their roots, and rejecting its dynamic power.
    Closer to home, he who trashes his own father is whizzing in the wind, and will be surprised to find it blowing back in his own face. He who resents and trashes his own father is in mortal danger of turning out just like him, and in fact he usually turns out still worse.

Comments are closed.

Shopping Cart