Holier Than Thou

May 7th, 2014 Posted by Susan's Musings 6 comments

There aren’t many people defending Donald Sterling. It’s something that I find difficult to do as well. From what I’ve read about him, he is not someone I want as a friend or even a neighbor. Leaving aside the racist comments that brought him down, I’m not a fan of those who lace their words with profanity or disrespect their marriage vows.

Still—as I read comments that charge him with being the worst kind of racist, I can’t agree. Were the words caught on tape despicable? Yes. Were they hurtful? Certainly. Do they invalidate everything else in his life and represent the totality of his views? Maybe, but possibly not.

Ancient Jewish wisdom states that you can truly see inside a person through, “kiso, koso and ka’aso;” when he loses control under the influence of money, alcohol or anger. Goaded to fury by his female friend, Sterling said things he most likely would not have chosen to articulate when he accepted the NAACP’s, Los Angeles Branch, man of the year award in 2009.

Does this make him the worst kind of racist? Is he worse than African-American thugs who “play” the knockout game, attacking people on the street because they are white or Asian? Is he worse than the white hoodlum who throws a stone through a window because he doesn’t want a Black family to move next door? Is he worse than a politician who may very well like people without regard to their color, but whose love of power and money leads him to vote against policies that will allow African-American children to get a good education? If erupting in contemptible words in a burst of anger is the worst racism imaginable, then we are indeed living in blessed times.

Ancient Jewish wisdom states that we should try to make our insides match out outsides. Most of us try to ‘put on a good face.’ No matter how down we are, we tend to put on a smile in public; we behave more politely when others are watching us; we are more truthful when we know our words are being monitored. This isn’t hypocrisy. It simply reflects our complex human make-up. When we internalize the happy, well-mannered and honest demeanor we like to project, we are exhibiting personal growth. “Letting it all hang out,” when we are in a bad mood or automatically succumbing to our body’s desires because, “I have to be true to myself,” is selfish, and not at all commendable.

While I have no desire to meet Donald Sterling, I have met – and I like – Mel Gibson. When he was drunk, a particular failing of his, he too was goaded to an angry outburst, in his case an anti-Semitic one. Certainly, he is responsible for his actions and words. Knowing his weakness, he shouldn’t drink. At the same time, if his words came from deep inside him, but his daily actions when not under the influence of drink or anger show respect and even affection for those he insulted while under the influence, then perhaps the criticism is wrong. It is not irrelevant that the Jews who regularly work with Mel, speak of him with warmth and admiration. None of them joined the legions attacking him.

I don’t know Mr. Sterling in the slightest. He too, is responsible for his words and actions, and maybe he really is a creep. Yet, as a human being with my own shortcomings and flaws, I know that I don’t want to be judged as a wife, a mother, a friend or a person, based on an isolated outburst.

Do you?

________________________________________________________

SALE: The Biblical Blueprint Set

5 audio CDs to improve your life
(great price by mail; even better price for instant download)

BiblicalBlueprintGroup

Final 24 hrs. for the Financial Book Package 1/2 price sale

Financial Book Package

6 comments

James says:

[Answer: No, I don’t!] Hello again! As usual, your message is brimming over with kindness and generosity, instead of the black bile of condemnation so rampant in the media. You are so right! Who among us emotional human beings has never spouted off and uttered some untoward remark? Who is not in need of forgiveness? I must actually praise the cool reaction of our President, who publicly delivered his verdict: There are people like that. Just let these people talk (or words to that effect).
Christ said in defense of the woman taken in adultery: let him who is without sin cast the first stone. This man’s adultery is not on trial here, but merely his incautious remark. What disquiets me is that his remark was uttered in private. The Rabbi teaches us that Scripture establishes the inviolate boundary between the public arena and the home environment, with the admonition that words spoken at home remain in the home. There are words not intended ‘for my ears’ and I do not want to hear them.
Like you, I feel sorry for those this man’s remark hurt. Yet this man was ‘set up.’ There are media keen on capturing snippets to brand opponents with ugly epithets in the public parade and destroy them. His remark was selected and released to public media by an act just as morally repugnant as wiretapping, and should be just as illegal. I am tempted to paraphrase old Voltaire to say ‘I disagree with what you say, but I defend to the death your right to say it in PRIVATE.’

Jan says:

I think that Mel’s problem was that while he was under the influence of alcohol and in an extremely stressful situation, he simply and unfortunately repeated what he had learned as a child under the tutelage of his anti-Semitic father. Mel personally is not anti-Semitic.

You are, of course, correct that the fact that he uttered these words in private matter a great deal. So many people, like Dennis Prager, were writing about that, that I didn’t have much to add to their words. But eroding trust between people is a huge problem with people freely recording and videoing each other.

Jan, I agree with you that his comments stem from indoctrination as a child and he deserves credit for breaking away from that.

Carol says:

I agree with James. One thing that people have not realized is that while Mr. Sterling’s rant was despicable it was a private conversation. Also, we still have free speech in this country. I cannot believe that a man’s property can be taken away from his for something he says. He can be censored by an organization but that organization cannot take away his right of speech. You are right Susan in a day when people are itching to catch other behaving badly so they can send in the tape to the television station, catching themselves behaving badly is an invasion of privacy.

Carol – It is a weird reality of democracy and freedom that you sometimes end up standing up for the rights of people whom you find despicable or with whom you simply disagree.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.This is a required field!

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

sixteen − six =